گروه آموزشی گروه مدیریت | سامانه جامع پژوهشی دانشگاه اصفهان

نمای کلی

گروه آموزش یکی از بخش‌های اصلی دانشکده است که مسئولیت برنامه‌ریزی، اجرا و نظارت بر فعالیت‌های آموزشی را بر عهده دارد. این گروه با همکاری اعضای هیئت علمی، به طراحی و به‌روزرسانی سرفصل‌های درسی، هماهنگی کلاس‌ها و ارتقاء کیفیت آموزشی می‌پردازد. هدف اصلی گروه آموزش، فراهم‌سازی بستری مناسب برای یادگیری مؤثر و توسعه توانمندی‌های علمی دانشجویان است. این گروه همچنین نقش مهمی در هدایت تحصیلی دانشجویان، پاسخ‌گویی به مسائل آموزشی و برگزاری جلسات مشاوره علمی ایفا می‌کند. با بهره‌گیری از روش‌های نوین آموزشی و توجه به نیازهای روز، گروه آموزش تلاش می‌کند تا فرآیند یادگیری را بهبود بخشد و زمینه‌ساز موفقیت تحصیلی دانشجویان باشد.

برونداد‌های پژوهشی

1465

همه موارد

1415

مقالات

کتاب

2026

مقالات

Evaluating hospital performance with additive DEA and MPI: the Isfahan University of Medical Science case study

( Article . Gold )

Ketabi, S.

Publication Date: 2025

Bmc Health Services Research (14726963)25(1)

Background: Hospitals are a vital pillar of the health system, and measuring their performance by an appropriate quantitative model is crucial. This study evaluated the performance of hospitals affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. It deals with the nature of dynamics (the performance of evaluation indicators over time), examining controllable, uncontrollable, and undesirable input and output indicators. Methods: This study evaluated the performance of 26 Isfahan University of Medical Science hospitals in terms of efficiency and productivity with hybrid Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models, namely, the additive classic, Malmquist productivity index (MPI), and super-efficiency models, from 2019 through 2022. Thirteen indicators (four inputs and nine outputs) were selected as model variables by brainstorming in the expert panel. Results: The average technical efficiency of hospitals during the four periods was 0.86, indicating an average inefficiency of 14%. Malmquist productivity index results over four periods showed hospitals operating with an average of 11% positive growth, reflecting an overall increase in productivity. Notably, some hospitals with high technical efficiency displayed lower total productivity growth rates due to fluctuations in specific indicators. On average, in the four under study years, 12 hospitals were efficient, of which 75% (9 hospitals) had performance progress (average MPI > 1). On the contrary, among the 14 inefficient hospitals during the four studied years, more than 90% of the hospitals had improved performance. Conclusion: This study introduces a multidimensional and dynamic model for evaluating hospital performance. While classic DEA models provide a statistical performance evaluation, the Malmquist Productivity Index reveals dynamic performance changes over time. These findings underscore the need for hospitals to adopt advanced quantitative models to optimize resource allocation and enhance service delivery. © The Author(s) 2024.